To Hell With Hate Rights
MissCohen
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit MissCohen's Xanga Site!

Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
Gender: Female


Interests: Judaism, NeoConservatism, Multiculturalism, Anti-Racism
Expertise: Student
Occupation: Student


Message: message me
Website: visit my website


Member Since: 9/26/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Groups Blogrings
Neoconservatism
previous - random - next

-- That's Right, I'm Political --
previous - random - next

I Support Our Troops
previous - random - next

Multiculturalism
previous - random - next

+Racism Is So Out Dated+
previous - random - next

.||. penGuins roCk my sOx!! .||.
previous - random - next

CUBS SUCK!!!
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Neoconservatism

While many people today know what "neoconservatism" is, some still do not. This is designed for the average citizen, and offers a brief education about neoconservatism

Many people know what a political conservative, aka, a "right-winger," is. He or she is a person who is politically and socially conservative. He or she holds fast to tradition and is wary of liberal trends such as feminism or handgun control.

A liberal, aka, a "left-winger" or "leftist," of course holds views opposite those of a conservative - as a rule, at least.

But what about neoconservatism?

Neoconservatism emerged as a force in America in the 1980s. The father of neoconservatism was a Jewish philosopher named Leo Strauss (1899-1973). It is significant that most of the influential followers of Strauss are also Jewish. Also significant is the fact that Strauss himself once publicly admitted that his ideology was centered around the Jews.

Neoconservatism, despite its name, is not a political movement per se, but is instead a racial movement: an ethnically-Jewish movement despite the fact that some non-Jews advocate neoconservatism.

Neoconservatism is a movement both created and run by Jews, most of whom were once leftists and who usually seemed unconcerned about Israel. Those Jews later "rediscovered" their ethnic roots and became pro-Israel Zionists. They created and spread neoconservatism largely for one reason: to use America in an ongoing effort to protect the Jewish state of Israel. Neoconservatives seek to unite America and Israel together in order to oppose any country in the world which objects to ideas that are "good for Israel" or, similarly, "good for Jews." Such an agenda, of course, strains America's relationships with many countries across the globe.

The neoconservative movement is steered by Jews within the federal government, major universities, private organizations and the media.

Importantly, neoconservatism is a proactive, not a reactive, movement. In that sense, it is aggressive in nature.

The standard neoconservative agenda includes:

1. reshaping the Middle East for Israel's by using American soldiers to wage war in that region, while, at the same time, referring to such war as being in America's best interests and/or referring to such war as a necessary part of the "war on terrorism"

2. advocating American foreign policies which benefit Israel

3. reshaping the political and social spectrum of the Middle East by using various methods other than war;

4. referring to anyone who doesn't embrace the neoconservative agenda as "anti-American" or "unpatriotic;"

5. criticizing and even penalizing any country which doesn't support the neoconservative agenda.

President George W. Bush's foreign policy is a neoconservative foreign policy. In fact, America's foreign policy has been neoconservative since at least the 1980s.



Monday, September 26, 2005

I support censorship on the Internet. This is because there is no such thing as “freedom of speech”. This term itself is ridiculous because one’s freedom to speak is limited by what another person wants to hear. You may quote the Universal declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) but this document is not a binding one, so its irrelevant.

Suppose someone publishes a blog topic, which is okay to him but offensive to me, I have two options. First is to file a civil lawsuit against him and seek appropriate damages (either monetary or not), and second is to lodge a police report and make it a criminal case.

All bloggers should never advocate racial supremacy, which is morally wrong and against the tenets of NeoConservatism. I personally dislike it and feel such bloggers should be either banned from the Internet for good and/or detained under the Internal Security Act for between 2 years to 20 years.